Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: Open source versus commercial systems|
|Authors:||Shah, J. |
|Citation:||Shah, J., Rajgor, D., Pradhan, S., McCready, M., Zaveri, A., Pietrobon, R. (2010). Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: Open source versus commercial systems. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 468 (10) : 2664-2671. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1469-3|
|Abstract:||Background: Collection and analysis of clinical data can help orthopaedic surgeons to practice evidence based medicine. Spreadsheets and offline relational databases are prevalent, but not flexible, secure, workflow friendly and do not support the generation of standardized and interoperable data. Additionally these data collection applications usually do not follow a structured and planned approach which may result in failure to achieve the intended goal. Questions/purposes: Our purposes are (1) to provide a brief overview of EDC systems, their types, and related pros and cons as well as to describe commonly used EDC platforms and their features; and (2) describe simple steps involved in designing a registry/clinical study in DADOS P, an open source EDC system. Where are we now?: Electronic data capture systems aimed at addressing these issues are widely being adopted at an institutional/national/ international level but are lacking at an individual level. A wide array of features, relative pros and cons and different business models cause confusion and indecision among orthopaedic surgeons interested in implementing EDC systems. Where do we need to go?: To answer clinical questions and actively participate in clinical studies, orthopaedic surgeons should collect data in parallel to their clinical activities. Adopting a simple, user-friendly, and robust EDC system can facilitate the data collection process. How do we get there?: Conducting a balanced evaluation of available options and comparing them with intended goals and requirements can help orthopaedic surgeons to make an informed choice. © 2010 The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.|
|Source Title:||Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on May 19, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Apr 10, 2018
checked on May 4, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.