Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Reproducibility of Corneal Graft Thickness measurements with COLGATE in patients who have undergone DSAEK (Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty)
Authors: Wong, M.H.Y.
Chew, A.
Htoon, H.M.
Lee, B.H.
Cheng, J.
Liu, J.
Tan, D.T.
Mehta, J.S. 
Keywords: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
Graft thickness
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2012
Citation: Wong, M.H.Y., Chew, A., Htoon, H.M., Lee, B.H., Cheng, J., Liu, J., Tan, D.T., Mehta, J.S. (2012-08-01). Reproducibility of Corneal Graft Thickness measurements with COLGATE in patients who have undergone DSAEK (Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty). BMC Medical Imaging 12 : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Background: The CorneaL GrAft Thickness Evaluation (COLGATE) system was recently developed to facilitate the evaluation of corneal graft thickness from OCT images. Graft thickness measurement can be a surrogate indicator for detecting graft failure or success. The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of the COLGATE system in measuring DSAEK graft area between two observers.Methods: This was a prospective case series in which 50 anterior segment OCT images of patients who had undergone DSAEK in either eye were analysed. Two observers (MW, AC) independently obtained the image analysis for the graft area using both semi automated and automated method. One week later, each observer repeated the analysis for the same set of images. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to analyze inter and intra observer agreement.Results: There was strong intraobserver correlation between the 2 semi automated readings obtained by both observers. (r = 0.936 and r = 0.962). Intraobserver ICC for observer 1 was 0.936 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.963) and 0.967 (95% CI 0.942 to 0.981) for observer 2. Likewise, there was also strong interobserver correlation (r = 0.913 and r = 0.969). The interobserver ICC for the first measurements was 0.911 (95% CI 0.849 to 0.949) and 0.968 (95% CI 0.945 to 0.982) for the second. There was statistical difference between the automatic and the semi automated readings for both observers (p = 0.006, p = 0.003). The automatic readings gave consistently higher values than the semi automated readings especially in thin grafts.Conclusion: The analysis from the COLGATE programme can be reproducible between different observers. Care must be taken when interpreting the automated analysis as they tend to over estimate measurements. © 2012 Wong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Medical Imaging
ISSN: 14712342
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-25
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 28, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.