Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.013
Title: Randomized controlled trial of intravitreal ranibizumab versus standard grid laser for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion
Authors: Tan, M.H.
McAllister, I.L.
Gillies, M.E.
Verma, N.
Banerjee, G.
Smithies, L.A.
Wong, W.-L.
Wong, T.Y. 
Issue Date: Jan-2014
Citation: Tan, M.H., McAllister, I.L., Gillies, M.E., Verma, N., Banerjee, G., Smithies, L.A., Wong, W.-L., Wong, T.Y. (2014-01). Randomized controlled trial of intravitreal ranibizumab versus standard grid laser for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion. American Journal of Ophthalmology 157 (1) : 237-247.e1. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.013
Abstract: Purpose To assess the efficacy of intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab for the treatment of center-involving macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) over 1 year compared with standard-of-care grid laser. Design A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods A total of 36 patients with vision loss in 1 eye attributable to macular edema following BRVO were recruited from 5 institutions. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a treatment group that received 6 monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab and thereafter monthly as needed based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) assessments on optical coherence tomography scans, or a standard-of-care group that received monthly sham injections for the 1-year duration of the study. Grid laser was administered at 13 and 25 weeks in both groups if criteria for laser treatment were met. Main outcome measures included mean change in BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcomes included anatomic outcomes and the percentage of patients requiring grid laser in both groups. Results Mean BCVA change from baseline was significantly greater in the treatment compared with the standard-of-care group at 12 months (12.5 ETDRS letters vs -1.6 ETDRS letters, P =.032). The mean CFT was significantly reduced in the treatment compared with standard-of-care group (361.7 μm vs 175.6 μm, P =.025). At 13 and 25 weeks, more patients in the standard-of-care group (68.4%, 50.0%) received grid laser than in the treatment group (6.7%, 8.3%). No new ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusions Compared with standard grid laser, intravitreal ranibizumab provided significant and sustained benefits in visual acuity gain and anatomic improvement in eyes with macular edema secondary to BRVO. © 2014 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source Title: American Journal of Ophthalmology
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108509
ISSN: 00029394
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.013
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.