Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Time and space in biogeography: Response to Parenti & Ebach (2013)|
|Authors:||De Bruyn, M.|
von Rintelen, K.
von Rintelen, T.
General area cladograms
Philosophy of science
|Citation:||De Bruyn, M., Stelbrink, B., Page, T.J., Phillips, M.J., Lohman, D.J., Albrecht, C., Hall, R., von Rintelen, K., Ng, P.K.L., Shih, H.-T., Carvalho, G.R., von Rintelen, T. (2013-11). Time and space in biogeography: Response to Parenti & Ebach (2013). Journal of Biogeography 40 (11) : 2204-2206. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12166|
|Abstract:||A recent Guest Editorial by Parenti & Ebach (2013, Journal of Biogeography, 40, 813-820) disagrees with the methods or interpretations in two of our recent papers. In addition, the authors open a debate on biogeographical concepts, and present an alternative philosophy for biogeographical research in the context of their recently described biogeographical subregion called 'Pandora'. We disagree with their approach and conclusions, and comment on several issues related to our differing conceptual approaches for biogeographical research; namely, our use of molecular phylogenetic analyses, including time estimates; and Parenti & Ebach's reliance on taxon/general area cladograms. Finally, we re-examine their 'tests' supporting the existence of 'Pandora'. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Biogeography|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jun 14, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 9, 2018
checked on Jun 8, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.