Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x
Title: The frog filter: Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography
Authors: Tingley, R.
Romagosa, C.M.
Kraus, F.
Bickford, D. 
Phillips, B.L.
Shine, R.
Keywords: Alien species
Amphibians
Anura
Caudata
Introduced species
Invasive species
Transportation
Issue Date: Jul-2010
Citation: Tingley, R., Romagosa, C.M., Kraus, F., Bickford, D., Phillips, B.L., Shine, R. (2010-07). The frog filter: Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19 (4) : 496-503. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x
Abstract: Aim: Invasive species often exhibit a highly non-random suite of traits relative to non-invasive taxa, and these biases reflect strong selection at a series of steps along the invasion pathway. Here we investigate traits that are favoured in the first of these steps: the introduction of species outside their native geographic range. We use the global introduction of amphibians as our case study. Location: Global. Methods: We examined whether taxonomy, body size and attributes of the native geographic range predict the likelihood of an introduction event in amphibians. We then determined whether these characteristics differed between amphibian species that have been introduced intentionally and those that have been introduced unintentionally (i.e. stowaways). Results: Comparisons of introduced and non-introduced amphibians reveal significant biases with respect to taxonomic position (c. 50% of all introduced species originate from only 5% of all families), and characteristics of the native geographic range (most introduced species originate from the Northern Hemisphere, occupy a wide geographic range and are sympatric with high densities of humans). Many of these biases presumably reflect the ease and likelihood of capturing and transporting such animals. Additionally, intentionally introduced species are of larger than average body size, occupy higher elevations in their native ranges, and are more likely to originate from the Northern Hemisphere than unintentionally introduced species. Main conclusions: Introduced amphibian species are not a random subset of the global amphibian fauna with respect to taxonomic affiliation and biogeography, and this restricts our ability to make robust generalizations regarding the ecological determinants of introduction success. Nevertheless, many of our findings are similar to those revealed by previous analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate introductions. Thus, our study suggests that biases in the anthropogenic mechanisms involved in transporting species around the globe are surprisingly consistent across broadly divergent taxa. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Source Title: Global Ecology and Biogeography
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/101921
ISSN: 1466822X
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on Dec 10, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

25
checked on Dec 14, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.