Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.475
DC FieldValue
dc.titleOccurrence, fate, and fluxes of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in an urban catchment: Marina Reservoir, Singapore
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, V.T.
dc.contributor.authorGin, K.Y.-H.
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, M.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-09T07:38:11Z
dc.date.available2014-10-09T07:38:11Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationNguyen, V.T., Gin, K.Y.-H., Reinhard, M., Liu, C. (2012). Occurrence, fate, and fluxes of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in an urban catchment: Marina Reservoir, Singapore. Water Science and Technology 66 (11) : 2439-2446. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.475
dc.identifier.issn02731223
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/91111
dc.description.abstractA study was carried out to characterize the occurrence, sources and sinks of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in the Marina Catchment and Reservoir, Singapore. Salinity depth profiles indicated the reservoir was stratified with lower layers consisting of sea water (salinity ranging from 32 to 35 g L-1) and a brackish surface layer containing approximately 14-65% seawater. The PFC mixture detected in catchment waters contained perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs), particularly perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), perfluorohexanoate (PFHpA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and PFC transformation products. PFC concentrations in storm runoff were generally higher than those in dry weather flow of canals and rivers. PFC concentration profiles measured during storm events indicated 'first flush' behavior, probably because storm water is leaching PFC compounds from non-point sources present in the catchment area. Storm runoff carries high concentrations of suspended solids (SS), which suggests that PFC transport is via SS. In Marina Bay, PFCs are deposited in the sediments along with the SS. In sediments, the total PFC concentration was 4,700 ng kg-1, approximately 200 times higher than in the bottom water layers. Total perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs), particularly PFOS and 6:2 fluoro telomer sulfonate (6:2 FtS) were dominant PFCs in the sediments. PFC sorption by sediments varied with perfluorocarbon chain length, type of functional group and sediment characteristics. A first approximation analysis based on SS transport suggested that the annual PFC input into the reservoir was approximately 35 ± 12 kgy-1. Contributions of SS, dry weather flow of river/canals, and rainfall were approximately 70, 25 and 5%, respectively. This information will be useful for improving strategies to protect the reservoir from PFC contamination. © IWA Publishing 2012.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.475
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFresh water
dc.subjectPerfluorochemicals
dc.subjectReservoir
dc.subjectRunoff
dc.subjectSediment
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.2166/wst.2012.475
dc.description.sourcetitleWater Science and Technology
dc.description.volume66
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page2439-2446
dc.description.codenWSTED
dc.identifier.isiut000312239400023
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.