Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A graphical approach to obtaining confidence limits of C pk||Authors:||Tang, L.C.
|Keywords:||Process capability analysis: C pkConfidence interval
|Issue Date:||1997||Citation:||Tang, L.C.,Than, S.E.,Ang, B.W. (1997). A graphical approach to obtaining confidence limits of C pk. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 13 (6) : 337-346. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||The process capability index C pk has been widely used as a process performance measure. In practice this index is estimated using sample data. Hence it is of great interest to obtain confidence limits for the actual index given a sample estimate. In this paper we depict graphically the relationship between process potential index (C p), process shift index (k) and percentage non-conforming (p). Based on the monotone properties of the relationship, we derive two-sided confidence limits for k and C pk under two different scenarios. These two limits are combined using the Bonferroni inequality to generate a third type of confidence limit. The performance of these limits of C pk in terms of their coverage probability and average width is evaluated by simulation. The most suitable type of confidence limit for each specific range of k is then determined. The usage of these confidence limits is illustrated via examples. Finally a performance comparison is done between the proposed confidence limits and three non-parametric bootstrap confidence limits. The results show that the proposed method consistently gives the smallest width and yet provides the intended coverage probability. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.||Source Title:||Quality and Reliability Engineering International||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/86990||ISSN:||07488017|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 14, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.