Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2008.40
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePower control for distributed MAC protocols in wireless ad hoc networks
dc.contributor.authorWang, W.
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, V.
dc.contributor.authorChua, K.-C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-07T04:35:05Z
dc.date.available2014-10-07T04:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2008-10
dc.identifier.citationWang, W., Srinivasan, V., Chua, K.-C. (2008-10). Power control for distributed MAC protocols in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 7 (10) : 1169-1183. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2008.40
dc.identifier.issn15361233
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/82920
dc.description.abstractIn wireless networks that use centralized transmission scheduling, reducing the transmission power normally leads to higher network transport throughput. In this paper, we investigate power control and spatial utilization in a different scenario, where the network adopts distributed MAC-layer coordination mechanisms. We first consider the widely adopted RTS/CTS-based MAC protocols. We show that an optimal power control protocol should use higher transmission power than the "just-enough" power in order to improve spatial utilization. The optimal protocol has a minimal transmission floor area of ⊖(dijdmax), where dmax is the maximal transmission range, and dij is the link length. This surprisingly implies that if a long link is broken into several short links, then the sum of the transmission floors reserved by the short links is still comparable to the floor reserved by the long link. Thus, using short links does not necessarily lead to higher transport throughput. Another consequence of this is that, with the optimal RTS/CTS based MAC, rate control can at best provide a factor of two improvement in transport throughput. We then extend our results to other distributed MAC protocols that use physical carrier sensing or busy tone as the control signal. Our simulation results show that the optimal power control scheme outperforms other popular MAC-layer power control protocols. We also validate our analysis regarding the impact of routing choices via extensive simulations. © 2008 IEEE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2008.40
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectMAC protocols
dc.subjectPower control
dc.subjectWireless ad hoc networks
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1109/TMC.2008.40
dc.description.sourcetitleIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.page1169-1183
dc.identifier.isiut000259192200002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on May 20, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on May 20, 2020

Page view(s)

46
checked on May 10, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.