Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/75314
DC FieldValue
dc.titleStopgap coagulation technology for arsenic removal from rural household drinking water
dc.contributor.authorYuan, T.
dc.contributor.authorHu, J.Y.
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Q.F.
dc.contributor.authorCheng, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorOng, S.L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-19T09:49:46Z
dc.date.available2014-06-19T09:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationYuan, T.,Hu, J.Y.,Luo, Q.F.,Cheng, J.P.,Ong, S.L. (2006). Stopgap coagulation technology for arsenic removal from rural household drinking water. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 6 (2) : 273-279. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn16069749
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/75314
dc.description.abstractThis study is intended to develop a stopgap coagulation protocol for immediate health protection of residents exposed to high arsenic from drinking water. The results of a simulated manual jar-test showed that ferric sulfate can maintain a satisfactory arsenic removal efficiency (>95%), and be relatively independent of water conditions. Combining with effective sand filtration, 20, 30, 60 mg/L of ferric sulfate were suitable for removing <0.5,0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0 mg/L of As(V), respectively. With decanting (after settling for 8 ∼ 10h), however, ferric sulfate of 60 or 70 mg/L was needed to remove <0.5 or 0.5-1.0 mg/L of As(V), respectively. The removal rates of As(III) could achieve similar levels to that of As(V) once the water samples were pre-oxidized. The javelle water was selected as site applicable oxidant for As(III), although ozone sparging, hydrogen dioxide solution and bleaching powder also showed good performances. It was noted that the stopgap coagulation protocol was readily and acceptable to be applied by the local residents. The makeshift strategy will immediately protect the health of local residents before some kinds of long term and effective ways could be applied. Experiences obtained in this study provide valuable information for other places encountering the arsenic problem in rural drinking water. © IWA Publishing 2006.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArsenic removal
dc.subjectFerric sulfate
dc.subjectHousehold drinking water
dc.subjectJavelle water
dc.subjectStopgap coagulation
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGG
dc.description.sourcetitleWater Science and Technology: Water Supply
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page273-279
dc.description.codenWSTWB
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

55
checked on May 31, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.