Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMaking robots persuasive: The influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power
dc.contributor.authorHam, J.
dc.contributor.authorBokhorst, R.
dc.contributor.authorCuijpers, R.
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Pol, D.
dc.contributor.authorCabibihan, J.-J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-19T03:17:20Z
dc.date.available2014-06-19T03:17:20Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationHam, J.,Bokhorst, R.,Cuijpers, R.,Van Der Pol, D.,Cabibihan, J.-J. (2011). Making robots persuasive: The influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 7072 LNAI : 71-83. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8</a>
dc.identifier.isbn9783642255038
dc.identifier.issn03029743
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/70879
dc.description.abstractSocial agency theory suggests that when an (artificial) agent combines persuasive strategies, its persuasive power increases. Therefore, we investigated whether a robot that uses two persuasive strategies is more persuasive than a robot that uses only one. Because in human face-to-face persuasion two crucial persuasive strategies are gazing and gestures, the current research investigated the combined and individual contribution of gestures and gazing on the persuasiveness of a storytelling robot. A robot told a persuasive story about the aversive consequences of lying to 48 participants. The robot used persuasive gestures (or not) and gazing (or not) to accompany this persuasive story. We assessed persuasiveness by asking participants to evaluate the lying individual in the story told by the robot. Results indicated that only gazing independently led to increased persuasiveness. Using persuasive gestures only led to increased persuasiveness when the robot combined it with (the persuasive strategy of) gazing. Without gazing, using persuasive gestures diminished robot persuasiveness. The implications of the current findings for theory and design of persuasive robots are discussed. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGazing
dc.subjectGestures
dc.subjectHead Movement
dc.subjectNao
dc.subjectPersuasion
dc.subjectPersuasive Robotics
dc.subjectPersuasive Technology
dc.subjectSocial Robotics
dc.subjectStorytelling Robot
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_8
dc.description.sourcetitleLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
dc.description.volume7072 LNAI
dc.description.page71-83
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.