Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/68076
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods
dc.contributor.authorPoh, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorAng, B.W.
dc.contributor.authorBai, F.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T06:09:30Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T06:09:30Z
dc.date.issued2001-01
dc.identifier.citationPoh, K.L.,Ang, B.W.,Bai, F. (2001-01). A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods. R and D Management 31 (1) : 63-73. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00336807
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/68076
dc.description.abstractA large number of methodologies for Research and Development (R&D) project evaluation have been developed and reported in the literature over the last few decades. Almost all of this literature focused on the mechanisms and underlying theoretical foundation on which the evaluation methods are based. Very little attention has been paid to the effectiveness and suitability of the techniques, especially a comparison of the techniques. This paper presents a comparative study on a number of classes of R&D evaluation methods based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. We look into the various factors and characteristics of R&D evaluation methods that affect their suitability. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to determine the critical factors.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentINDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
dc.description.sourcetitleR and D Management
dc.description.volume31
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page63-73
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

170
checked on May 22, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.