Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||High-aperture beams: Reply to comment||Authors:||Sheppard, C.J.R.||Issue Date:||Apr-2007||Citation:||Sheppard, C.J.R. (2007-04). High-aperture beams: Reply to comment. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision 24 (4) : 1211-1213. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001211||Abstract:||Seshadri's claim [J. Opt. Soc. A 23, 3238 (2006)] that the singularity in the simple complex-source point model is not nonphysical is disputed. The branch cut behavior is further discussed. Two different forms for the complex-source point model for a Gaussian beam are identified, corresponding to different choices for the sign of a square root or in terms of oblate spheroidal coordinates to two different branch cuts. One of these solutions corresponds to a beamlike solution, while the second gives a wave that radiates outward from the source. Both exhibit nonphysical singularities. These singularities are avoided by using a complex-source/sink model. The choice of branch cut is also important in defining the oblate spheroidal beams, based on spheroidal harmonics. © 2007 Optical Society of America.||Source Title:||Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/67960||ISSN:||10847529||DOI:||10.1364/JOSAA.24.001211|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Oct 16, 2019
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Oct 8, 2019
checked on Oct 13, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.