Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Aesthetic laser marking assessment||Authors:||Ng, T.W.
|Issue Date:||Apr-2000||Citation:||Ng, T.W.,Yeo, S.C. (2000-04). Aesthetic laser marking assessment. Optics and Laser Technology 32 (3) : 187-191. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||In this paper, the CIE color difference formula was applied to evaluate four types of material surfaces; anodized aluminium, stainless steel, poly-butylene tetra-phthalate (PBT), and phenol formaldehyde, marked using a Nd:YAG laser, and viewed under three common modes of illumination; tungsten, fluorescent and daylight. The color difference values were based on the spectral reflectance readings obtained from a spectrophotometer. Each material exhibited different color difference trends in relation to marking speed for the different modes of illumination. Nevertheless, general comparisons could be made in terms of operational marking speeds and the maximal color difference values for each material. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.||Source Title:||Optics and Laser Technology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/67738||ISSN:||00303992|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Sep 8, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.