Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Reconstruction in interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy: Comparison with optical coherence tomography and digital holographic microscopy||Authors:||Sheppard, C.J.R.
|Issue Date:||Mar-2012||Citation:||Sheppard, C.J.R., Kou, S.S., Depeursinge, C. (2012-03). Reconstruction in interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy: Comparison with optical coherence tomography and digital holographic microscopy. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision 29 (3) : 244-250. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.000244||Abstract:||It is shown that the spatial frequencies recorded in interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy do not correspond to exact backscattering [as they do in unistatic synthetic aperture radar (SAR)] and that the reconstruction process based on SAR is therefore based on an approximation. The spatial frequency response is developed based on the three-dimensional coherent transfer function approach and compared with that in optical coherence tomography and digital holographic microscopy. © 2012 Optical Society of America.||Source Title:||Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/67253||ISSN:||10847529||DOI:||10.1364/JOSAA.29.000244|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Mar 26, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Mar 19, 2020
checked on Mar 30, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.