Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.023
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEffect of preload on the axial capacity of concrete-filled composite columns
dc.contributor.authorRichard Liew, J.Y.
dc.contributor.authorXiong, D.X.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T08:17:19Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T08:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.identifier.citationRichard Liew, J.Y., Xiong, D.X. (2009-03). Effect of preload on the axial capacity of concrete-filled composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65 (3) : 709-722. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.023
dc.identifier.issn0143974X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/65488
dc.description.abstractConcrete-filled tubes are often preferred for the construction of high-rise buildings because of their high strength and stiffness compared to conventional reinforced concrete or steel columns. However, prior to infilling of concrete, the steel tubes are subjected to preloads from upper floors arising from construction loads and permanent loads of the building. These preloads cause initial stresses and deformations in the steel tubes which would affect the load carrying capacity of the composite columns. In this paper, a design method based on a modified Eurocode 4 approach, incorporating the effect of preload, is proposed to evaluate the axial capacity of concrete filled composite columns. Eight full-scale composite column specimens were tested. Parameters studied included the strength of the concrete infill, slenderness of the columns and the amount of preload applied on the steel tubes. Results obtained from the proposed method are compared against test results and other published data. Comparison studies show that the test results are on average 3% higher than predicted results with a standard deviation of 0.089. Finite element analyses are also performed for systematic verification, and the results are 8% higher than predicted results. It is conclude that the proposed design method is accurate and mostly conservative and can be readily used in the context of Eurocode 4: Part 1.1 for designing composite columns. © 2009.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.023
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBuckling
dc.subjectComposite column
dc.subjectComposite construction
dc.subjectEurocode
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectMultistorey construction
dc.subjectPreload effect
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.023
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Constructional Steel Research
dc.description.volume65
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page709-722
dc.identifier.isiut000263195300021
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

82
checked on Mar 17, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

63
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Page view(s)

151
checked on Mar 16, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.