Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2273665
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGeneral subspace learning with corrupted training data via graph embedding
dc.contributor.authorBao, B.-K.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, G.
dc.contributor.authorHong, R.
dc.contributor.authorYan, S.
dc.contributor.authorXu, C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T02:50:55Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T02:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBao, B.-K., Liu, G., Hong, R., Yan, S., Xu, C. (2013). General subspace learning with corrupted training data via graph embedding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22 (11) : 4380-4393. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2273665
dc.identifier.issn10577149
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/56117
dc.description.abstractWe address the following subspace learning problem: supposing we are given a set of labeled, corrupted training data points, how to learn the underlying subspace, which contains three components: an intrinsic subspace that captures certain desired properties of a data set, a penalty subspace that fits the undesired properties of the data, and an error container that models the gross corruptions possibly existing in the data. Given a set of data points, these three components can be learned by solving a nuclear norm regularized optimization problem, which is convex and can be efficiently solved in polynomial time. Using the method as a tool, we propose a new discriminant analysis (i.e., supervised subspace learning) algorithm called Corruptions Tolerant Discriminant Analysis (CTDA), in which the intrinsic subspace is used to capture the features with high within-class similarity, the penalty subspace takes the role of modeling the undesired features with high between-class similarity, and the error container takes charge of fitting the possible corruptions in the data. We show that CTDA can well handle the gross corruptions possibly existing in the training data, whereas previous linear discriminant analysis algorithms arguably fail in such a setting. Extensive experiments conducted on two benchmark human face data sets and one object recognition data set show that CTDA outperforms the related algorithms. © 2013 IEEE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2273665
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcorrupted training data
dc.subjectdiscriminant analysis
dc.subjectgraph embedding
dc.subjectSubspace learning
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1109/TIP.2013.2273665
dc.description.sourcetitleIEEE Transactions on Image Processing
dc.description.volume22
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page4380-4393
dc.description.codenIIPRE
dc.identifier.isiut000324597800018
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.