Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparability of different methods for estimating influenza infection rates over a single epidemic wave
Authors: Lee, V.J. 
Chen, M.I. 
Yap, J.
Ong, J.
Lim, W.-Y. 
Lin, R.T.P.
Barr, I.
Ong, J.B.S.
Mak, T.M.
Goh, L.G.
Leo, Y.S.
Kelly, P.M.
Cook, A.R. 
Keywords: Epidemics
influenza, human
population surveillance
serologic tests
statistics as topic
Issue Date: 15-Aug-2011
Citation: Lee, V.J., Chen, M.I., Yap, J., Ong, J., Lim, W.-Y., Lin, R.T.P., Barr, I., Ong, J.B.S., Mak, T.M., Goh, L.G., Leo, Y.S., Kelly, P.M., Cook, A.R. (2011-08-15). Comparability of different methods for estimating influenza infection rates over a single epidemic wave. American Journal of Epidemiology 174 (4) : 468-478. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Estimation of influenza infection rates is important for determination of the extent of epidemic spread and for calculation of severity indicators. The authors compared estimated infection rates from paired and cross-sectional serologic surveys, rates of influenza like illness (ILI) obtained from sentinel general practitioners (GPs), and ILI samples that tested positive for influenza using data from similar periods collected during the 2009 H1N1 epidemic in Singapore. The authors performed sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of estimates to input parameter uncertainties, and they determined sample sizes required for differing levels of precision. Estimates from paired seroconversion were 17% (95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI): 14, 20), higher than those from cross-sectional serology (12%, 95% BCI: 9, 17). Adjusted ILI estimates were 15% (95% BCI: 10, 25), and estimates computed from ILI and laboratory data were 12% (95% BCI: 8, 18). Serologic estimates were least sensitive to the risk of input parameter misspecification. ILI-based estimates were more sensitive to parameter misspecification, though this was lessened by incorporation of laboratory data. Obtaining a 5-percentage-point spread for the 95% confidence interval in infection rates would require more than 1,000 participants per serologic study, a sentinel network of 90 GPs, or 50 GPs when combined with laboratory samples. The various types of estimates will provide comparable findings if accurate input parameters can be obtained. © 2011 The Author.
Source Title: American Journal of Epidemiology
ISSN: 00029262
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr113
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.