Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5198635
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA mutual information approach for comparing LLR metrics for iterative decoders
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J.
dc.contributor.authorArmand, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorPooi, Y.K.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T08:32:48Z
dc.date.available2014-04-24T08:32:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationZhang, J.,Armand, M.A.,Pooi, Y.K. (2009). A mutual information approach for comparing LLR metrics for iterative decoders. IEEE International Conference on Communications : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5198635" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5198635</a>
dc.identifier.isbn9781424434350
dc.identifier.issn05361486
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/51087
dc.description.abstractWe develop an approach to compare different log-likelihood ratio (LLR) metrics for iterative soft decoding. We show that an LLR metric for a function of the received signals is a sufficient statistic to this function about the binary channel input. We also prove that when the function belongs to a set of specific mappings, the corresponding LLR metric can feed the maximal mutual information to the decoder. For decoding low density parity check codes with the belief-propagation decoder, we develop a method to estimate the minimal average number of iterations. The results are applied to compare the Gaussian metric in [1] and the two-symbol-observation-interval LLR metric in [2]. The latter is shown to be superior. ©2009 IEEE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5198635
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1109/ICC.2009.5198635
dc.description.sourcetitleIEEE International Conference on Communications
dc.description.page-
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.