Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSqueeze me, but don't tease me: Human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination
dc.contributor.authorSchirmer, A.
dc.contributor.authorTeh, K.S.
dc.contributor.authorWang, S.
dc.contributor.authorVijayakumar, R.
dc.contributor.authorChing, A.
dc.contributor.authorNithianantham, D.
dc.contributor.authorEscoffier, N.
dc.contributor.authorCheok, A.D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T07:24:56Z
dc.date.available2014-04-24T07:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.identifier.citationSchirmer, A., Teh, K.S., Wang, S., Vijayakumar, R., Ching, A., Nithianantham, D., Escoffier, N., Cheok, A.D. (2011-06). Squeeze me, but don't tease me: Human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination. Social Neuroscience 6 (3) : 219-230. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
dc.identifier.issn17470919
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/51046
dc.description.abstractBeing touched by another person influences our readiness to empathize with and support that person. We asked whether this influence arises from somatosensory experience, the proximity to the person and/or an attribution of the somatosensory experience to the person. Moreover, we were interested in whether and how touch affects the processing of ensuing events. To this end, we presented neutral and negative pictures with or without gentle pressure to the participants' forearm. In Experiment 1, pressure was applied by a friend, applied by a tactile device and attributed to the friend, or applied by a tactile device and attributed to a computer. Across these conditions, touch enhanced event-related potential (ERP) correlates of picture processing. Pictures elicited a larger posterior N100 and a late positivity discriminated more strongly between pictures of neutral and negative content when participants were touched. Experiment 2 replicated these findings while controlling for the predictive quality of touch. Experiment 3 replaced tactile contact with a tone, which failed to enhance N100 amplitude and emotion discrimination reflected by the late positivity. This indicates that touch sensitizes ongoing cognitive and emotional processes and that this sensitization is mediated by bottom-up somatosensory processing. Moreover, touch seems to be a special sensory signal that influences recipients in the absence of conscious reflection and that promotes prosocial behavior. © 2010 Psychology Press.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBrain
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectEmpathy
dc.subjectSocial facilitation
dc.subjectSomatosensory
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentRISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
dc.description.doi10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
dc.description.sourcetitleSocial Neuroscience
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page219-230
dc.identifier.isiut000290967600002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

35
checked on Nov 6, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on Nov 6, 2019

Page view(s)

104
checked on Oct 28, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.