Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:4(277)
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTemporal logic representation schema for intermediate function
dc.contributor.authorSong, Y.
dc.contributor.authorChua, D.K.H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-23T07:09:22Z
dc.date.available2014-04-23T07:09:22Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationSong, Y., Chua, D.K.H. (2007). Temporal logic representation schema for intermediate function. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133 (4) : 277-286. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:4(277)
dc.identifier.issn07339364
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/50739
dc.description.abstractThere are temporal relationships other than the precedence ones between construction activities. Many of these relationships are related to the perspective of intermediate function requirement. The construction industry still lacks a representation schema for capturing the temporal logics residing in this kind of construction requirement. This study presents a schema for representing these temporal logics from three perspectives, namely the construction life cycle of a single product component, the functional interdependencies between two in-progress components, and the availability conditions of an intermediate functionality. In this way, the concurrency relationships among the construction processes can be identified and evaluated, and the intermediate function analysis can be conducted more efficiently, thus contributing to improvement of the executability of construction schedules. Additionally, the temporal logics have been formulated in the format based on temporal interval algebra, which provides a richer semantic representation compared to the traditional precedence relationship types. Finally, using a four-dimensional simulation prototype, a case study of constructing the deck of a bridge by the balanced cantilever approach is modeled to demonstrate the representation of the three perspectives of intermediate function requirements. © 2007 ASCE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:4(277)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectConstructability
dc.subjectConstruction management
dc.subjectConstruction methods
dc.subjectScheduling
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:4(277)
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
dc.description.volume133
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page277-286
dc.description.codenJCEMD
dc.identifier.isiut000245190800003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Jan 24, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Jan 24, 2022

Page view(s)

117
checked on Jan 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.