Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2319/120706-495.1
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAutotransplantation of 28 premolar donor teeth in 24 orthodontic patients
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, T.
dc.contributor.authorDeguchi, T.
dc.contributor.authorKageyama, T.
dc.contributor.authorKanomi, R.
dc.contributor.authorInoue, M.
dc.contributor.authorFoong, K.W.C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T05:36:09Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T05:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationTanaka, T., Deguchi, T., Kageyama, T., Kanomi, R., Inoue, M., Foong, K.W.C. (2008). Autotransplantation of 28 premolar donor teeth in 24 orthodontic patients. Angle Orthodontist 78 (1) : 12-19. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2319/120706-495.1
dc.identifier.issn00033219
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46686
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the null hypothesis that premolar autotransplantation is not successful for orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 28 premolar transplants from 24 orthodontic patients were associated with orthodontic treatment. At a routine 3-month appointment, patients underwent a dental radiograph and a chair-side observation for periodontal problems. Three sets of dental radiographs were taken by one dental assistant using a custom holder at: preoperation (T0), 2 year postoperation (T1), and retention (T2) (4- to 14-year follow-up observation) stages. All transplants were conducted in a one-phase operation by one operator (Dr Inoue). Recipient sites were: ten for missing maxillary canines, nine for maxillary centrals and laterals, eight for lower second premolar, and five for other missing premolar sites. All recipients maintained the retained primary tooth with a socket. Results: The success ratio of all 28 transplants was 100%, although four transplants shorter than a 4-year period of observation were omitted. Two transplant patients, one with a medical history of histiocytosis and the other with a history of osteomyelitis of the maxilla without a recipient socket, were also excluded from this study. Eleven of 22 premolar transplants had a root canal treatment (RCT), four of which had RCT within 2 years after the operation. Conclusions: The null hypothesis was rejected. The success ratio of premolar transplants was 100%. © 2007 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/120706-495.1
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAutotransplantation
dc.subjectDonor premolar
dc.subjectHypodontia
dc.subjectLong-term follow-up
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectTooth movement
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentPREVENTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.2319/120706-495.1
dc.description.sourcetitleAngle Orthodontist
dc.description.volume78
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page12-19
dc.description.codenANORA
dc.identifier.isiut000252511100002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on Jan 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on Sep 30, 2021

Page view(s)

150
checked on Jan 13, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.