Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00021-8
DC FieldValue
dc.titleProperty rights, collective sales and government intervention: Averting a tragedy of the anticommons
dc.contributor.authorSim, L.-L.
dc.contributor.authorLum, S.-K.
dc.contributor.authorMalone-Lee, L.C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T05:10:56Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T05:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationSim, L.-L., Lum, S.-K., Malone-Lee, L.C. (2002). Property rights, collective sales and government intervention: Averting a tragedy of the anticommons. Habitat International 26 (4) : 457-470. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00021-8
dc.identifier.issn01973975
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46219
dc.description.abstractIn response to the need to cater for the requirements of a larger future population, the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore released development guide plans, which have provided for higher development intensity to residential land in various parts of the island. One of the impacts is that many property owners in Singapore have banded together to capitalize on the "marriage value" of the en bloc site to reap big windfalls as compared to individual sales. But there were minority owners who objected to the sale. The Land Titles (Strata) (Amendment) Act 1999 was passed on 11 October 1999 to facilitate such en bloc sales as these will release prime land for higher density redevelopment to provide more quality private housing in land-scarce Singapore. This paper shows how property rights and property ownership could have led to a tragedy of the anticommons and how government intervention through legislation has averted such a tragedy. Whilst the Land Titles (Strata) (Amendment) Act 1999 has been successful in facilitating en bloc sales resulting in optimization of scarce land resources, it has raised controversial issues such as majority rule versus minority protection and the attenuation of property rights. The authors conclude that in land-scarce Singapore, public good, in that more land will be made available for private housing for the majority, should take precedence. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00021-8
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnticommons
dc.subjectCollective sales
dc.subjectGovernment intervention
dc.subjectProperty rights
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.description.doi10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00021-8
dc.description.sourcetitleHabitat International
dc.description.volume26
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page457-470
dc.identifier.isiut000179316100002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Nov 28, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Nov 28, 2022

Page view(s)

348
checked on Nov 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.