Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Airflow dynamics of coughing in healthy human volunteers by shadowgraph imaging: An aid to aerosol infection control||Authors:||Tang, J.W.
de Wang, L.
|Issue Date:||2012||Citation:||Tang, J.W., Nicolle, A., Pantelic, J., Koh, G.C., de Wang, L., Amin, M., Klettner, C.A., Cheong, D.K.W., Sekhar, C., Tham, K.W. (2012). Airflow dynamics of coughing in healthy human volunteers by shadowgraph imaging: An aid to aerosol infection control. PLoS ONE 7 (4) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034818||Abstract:||Cough airflow dynamics have been previously studied using a variety of experimental methods. In this study, real-time, non-invasive shadowgraph imaging was applied to obtain additional analyses of cough airflows produced by healthy volunteers. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 women, mean age 32.2±12.9 years; 10 men, mean age 25.3±2.5 years) were asked to cough freely, then into their sleeves (as per current US CDC recommendations) in this study to analyze cough airflow dynamics. For the 10 females (cases 1-10), their maximum detectable cough propagation distances ranged from 0.16-0.55 m, with maximum derived velocities of 2.2-5.0 m/s, and their maximum detectable 2-D projected areas ranged from 0.010-0.11 m 2, with maximum derived expansion rates of 0.15-0.55 m 2/s. For the 10 males (cases 11-20), their maximum detectable cough propagation distances ranged from 0.31-0.64 m, with maximum derived velocities of 3.2-14 m/s, and their maximum detectable 2-D projected areas ranged from 0.04-0.14 m 2, with maximum derived expansion rates of 0.25-1.4 m 2/s. These peak velocities were measured when the visibility of the exhaled airflows was optimal and compare favorably with those reported previously using other methods, and may be seen as a validation of these previous approaches in a more natural setting. However, the propagation distances can only represent a lower limit due to the inability of the shadowgraph method to visualize these cough airflows once their temperature cools to that of the ambient air, which is an important limitation of this methodology. The qualitative high-speed video footage of these volunteers coughing into their sleeves demonstrates that although this method rarely completely blocks the cough airflow, it decelerates, splits and redirects the airflow, eventually reducing its propagation. The effectiveness of this intervention depends on optimum positioning of the arm over the nose and mouth during coughing, though unsightly stains on sleeves may make it unacceptable to some. © 2012 Tang et al.||Source Title:||PLoS ONE||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46030||ISSN:||19326203||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0034818|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|2012-Airflow_Dynamics_of_Coughing-published.PDF||823.44 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.