Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1139/L06-119
DC FieldValue
dc.titleBuilding a relational contracting culture and integrated teams
dc.contributor.authorRahman, M.M.
dc.contributor.authorKumaraswamy, M.M.
dc.contributor.authorLing, F.Y.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T04:35:07Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T04:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationRahman, M.M., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Ling, F.Y.Y. (2007). Building a relational contracting culture and integrated teams. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34 (1) : 75-88. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1139/L06-119
dc.identifier.issn03151468
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45583
dc.description.abstractTargeting integration in construction, this study compares the suitability of various factors and strategies to provide suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives for building a relational contracting (RC) culture and fostering effective teamwork. Results from statistical analyses of 96 questionnaire responses from Singapore contractors, consultants, and clients are presented. Despite obvious differences in perceptions among different groups of respondents on the relative usefulness of individual factors, it was observed that trust should broadly be at the core of RC and team-building. Although some factors appear to be more important than others, the overall results indicate that Singaporean industry participants prefer to target integration in construction through (i) trust-based contractual and operational arrangements and (ii) extended use of relational qualities in team selection for postcontract partnering-type RC arrangements between clients and contractors. The results also suggest the need for an interrelated and consolidated approach, both for propagating RC and for building integrated project teams. Like many other countries, the results indicate the readiness of Singaporean industry participants to incorporate RC and team-building techniques in a move towards improved performance and value for money. The results may be applicable to other countries or contracting regimes, especially where the practice of RC is at an early stage. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives. © 2007 NRC Canada.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/L06-119
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectConstruction
dc.subjectCulture
dc.subjectIntegration
dc.subjectRelational contracting
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectTeam-building
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.description.doi10.1139/L06-119
dc.description.sourcetitleCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering
dc.description.volume34
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page75-88
dc.description.codenCJCEB
dc.identifier.isiut000246262700008
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.