Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Intoxication is never a defence||Authors:||Simester, A.P.||Keywords:||Basic intent
|Issue Date:||2009||Citation:||Simester, A.P. (2009). Intoxication is never a defence. Criminal Law Review (1) : 3-14. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.||Abstract:||This article considers the intoxication doctrine, including whether it is evidential or substantive in nature, and what work is done by the basic-versusspecific intent distinction. Most importantly, the article analyses the structure of the doctrine itself. Sometimes thought of as a defence, the article argues that it is an entirely different kind of doctrine, one that imposes constructive liability upon offenders. Once this is seen, we can better assess its rightful place in the law. © 2009 THOMSON REUTERS (LEGAL) LIMITED.||Source Title:||Criminal Law Review||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45404||ISSN:||0011135X|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Apr 7, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.