Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45381
DC FieldValue
dc.titleBeyond the torrens mirror: A framework of the in personam exception to indefeasibility
dc.contributor.authorWu, T.H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-12T13:36:11Z
dc.date.available2013-10-12T13:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationWu, T.H. (2008). Beyond the torrens mirror: A framework of the in personam exception to indefeasibility. Melbourne University Law Review 32 (2) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00258938
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45381
dc.description.abstractOne of the central tenets of the Torrens system is that the registered proprietor is conferred indefeasible title. Indefeasibility of title is subject to an in personam exception. The content of the in personam exception to indefeasibility has been a source of debate in many Torrens jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to map out a theoretical structure to analyse the ambit of the in personam exception so as to provide a principled development of the law in this area. This article will also attempt to explain how this proposed theoretical structure of the in personam exception deals with constructive trust claims, knowing receipt, undue influence, unconscionable dealing, duress and certain restitutionary claims.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentLAW
dc.description.sourcetitleMelbourne University Law Review
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page-
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.