Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, C.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sivanathan, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Narayanan, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ganegoda, D.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bauer, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bodenhausen, G.V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Murnighan, K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-09T09:16:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-09T09:16:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wang, C.S., Sivanathan, N., Narayanan, J., Ganegoda, D.B., Bauer, M., Bodenhausen, G.V., Murnighan, K. (2011). Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116 (1) : 46-54. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 07495978 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44650 | |
dc.description.abstract | Individuals driven by negative emotions often punish non-cooperators at a cost to themselves. The current research demonstrates that, although time delays can attenuate this effect, they can also produce unintended consequences. Five experiments investigated the effects of time delays and thought patterns on punishments in direct and third party interactions. The results show that time delays decreased punishment (Experiment 1) by reducing negative emotions (Experiments 2A and 2B). However, thought patterns during a delay were crucially important (Experiments 3A and 3B): People who engaged in a distraction task punished less; people who engaged in affective rumination punished more; and people who engaged in cognitive reappraisal were unaffected by a delay. These differences meant that, after a time delay, affective ruminators administered greater punishments than cognitive reappraisers or distracted individuals. Implications of these findings for managing punitive impulses via time delays are discussed. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Anger | |
dc.subject | Emotional regulation | |
dc.subject | Retribution | |
dc.subject | Rumination | |
dc.subject | Time delay | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATION | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes | |
dc.description.volume | 116 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.page | 46-54 | |
dc.description.coden | OBDPF | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000294579500004 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
SCOPUSTM
Citations
38
checked on Jun 24, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
38
checked on Jun 24, 2022
Page view(s)
188
checked on Jun 23, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.