Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1145/1275511.1275515
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEvaluating the boundary conditions of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory investigation
dc.contributor.authorChan, H.C.
dc.contributor.authorTeo, H.-H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-11T10:11:29Z
dc.date.available2013-07-11T10:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationChan, H.C., Teo, H.-H. (2007). Evaluating the boundary conditions of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory investigation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14 (2). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1145/1275511.1275515
dc.identifier.issn10730516
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/42524
dc.description.abstractThe technology acceptance model (TAM) is very widely used for studying technology acceptance. The model states that an individual's behavioral intention (BI) to use an information system is determined by his perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) of it. While many studies have applied the TAM, none has examined the model's behavior over its entire value range. We conducted two surveys to examine the values of BI over the two-dimensional boundary space formed by PU and PEOU. Contrary to current understanding, we find that the effects of PU and PEOU vary over the boundary space. © 2007 ACM.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1275511.1275515
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBehavioral intention
dc.subjectPerceived ease of use
dc.subjectPerceived usefulness
dc.subjectTechnology acceptance model
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINFORMATION SYSTEMS
dc.description.doi10.1145/1275511.1275515
dc.description.sourcetitleACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
dc.description.volume14
dc.description.issue2
dc.identifier.isiut000253499800004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Jul 8, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Jul 8, 2020

Page view(s)

194
checked on Jun 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.