Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2012040102
Title: | An alternative Fit through Problem Representation in Cognitive Fit Theory | Authors: | Chan, H.C. Goswami, S. Kim, H.-W. |
Keywords: | Cognitive Fit Theory Hick's Law Mental Representation Problem Solving Process Spreadsheet |
Issue Date: | 2012 | Citation: | Chan, H.C., Goswami, S., Kim, H.-W. (2012). An alternative Fit through Problem Representation in Cognitive Fit Theory. Journal of Database Management 23 (2) : 22-43. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2012040102 | Abstract: | This paper uses cognitive fit theory to analyze the problem solving process in spreadsheet analyses. Cognitive fit theory proposes the formation of mental representation as a part of the problem solving process. However, there is little research examining mental representation, which is a key concept in cognitive fit theory. This study examines the formation of mental representation and proposes an alternative mechanism of cognitive fit between different problem representations and their corresponding mental representations when the task is invariant, but the problem representation changes. Mental representation is then empirically assessed based on the application of Hick's law, which states that the response time of users making a choice varies with the logarithm of the number of possible choices. Therefore, this study contributes to research on cognitive fit theory by proposing an alternative fit and by demonstrating a feasible approach for identifying mental representations. It contributes to spreadsheet research by showing how problem representations affect task performance in the case of spreadsheet error correction. Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. | Source Title: | Journal of Database Management | URI: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/42511 | ISSN: | 10638016 | DOI: | 10.4018/jdm.2012040102 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on Feb 23, 2021
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
checked on Feb 23, 2021
Page view(s)
123
checked on Feb 16, 2021
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.