Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? Large violations of noncontextuality in quantum theory||Authors:||Vidick, T.
|Issue Date:||2011||Citation:||Vidick, T., Wehner, S. (2011). Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? Large violations of noncontextuality in quantum theory. Physical Review Letters 107 (3). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.030402||Abstract:||A central question in our understanding of the physical world is how our knowledge of the whole relates to our knowledge of the individual parts. One aspect of this question is the following: to what extent does ignorance about a whole preclude knowledge of at least one of its parts? Relying purely on classical intuition, one would certainly be inclined to conjecture that a strong ignorance of the whole cannot come without significant ignorance of at least one of its parts. Indeed, we show that this reasoning holds in any noncontextual (NC) hidden-variable model (HV). Curiously, however, such a conjecture is false in quantum theory: we provide an explicit example where a large ignorance about the whole can coexist with an almost perfect knowledge of each of its parts. More specifically, we provide a simple information-theoretic inequality satisfied in any NC HV, but which can be arbitrarily violated by quantum mechanics. © 2011 American Physical Society.||Source Title:||Physical Review Letters||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/38964||ISSN:||00319007||DOI:||10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.030402|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.