Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1159/000530165
Title: | Insights from an Exploratory Retrospective Cohort Study: Are Face-to-Face Follow-Up Consultations after Colonoscopy a Thing of the Past? | Authors: | Lau, Jerrald Pang, Ning-Qi Ang, Chermaine Tan, Ker-Kan |
Keywords: | Colonoscopy Healthcare sustainability New models of care Teleconsultation |
Issue Date: | 24-Mar-2023 | Publisher: | S. Karger AG | Citation: | Lau, Jerrald, Pang, Ning-Qi, Ang, Chermaine, Tan, Ker-Kan (2023-03-24). Insights from an Exploratory Retrospective Cohort Study: Are Face-to-Face Follow-Up Consultations after Colonoscopy a Thing of the Past?. Digestive Diseases 41 (4). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1159/000530165 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Background: Colonoscopy is a commonly performed procedure, but most patients will not actually be found with colorectal cancer. Subsequent face-to-face consultations to explain post-colonoscopy findings are common despite the time and cost-saving benefits of teleconsultation, especially in a post-COVID-19 era. This exploratory retrospective study examined the proportion of post-colonoscopy follow-up consultations that could have been converted to teleconsultation within a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Methods: A retrospective cohort of all patients who underwent colonoscopy in the institution from July to September 2019 was identified. All follow-up face-to-face consultations related to the index colonoscopy from the scope date to 6 months post-colonoscopy were traced. Clinical data relevant to the index colonoscopy and these consultations were extracted from electronic medical records. Results: The cohort consisted of 859 patients (68.5% male, age range: 18–96 years). Of these, 15 (1.7%) had colorectal cancer, but the majority (n = 643, 74.9%) were scheduled for at least one post-colonoscopy visit – a total of 884 face-to-face clinical visits. The final sample was 682 (77.1%) face-to-face post-colonoscopy visits that did not involve any procedures performed or indicated the need for any subsequent follow-up. Conclusion: If such “unnecessary” post-colonoscopy consultations exist within our institution, then similar situations possibly occur elsewhere. As COVID-19 continues to periodically tax healthcare systems worldwide, preservation of resources will remain integral alongside quality standards of routine patient care. There is a need for detailed analyses and modeling to hypothesize potential savings by also considering the start-up and maintenance costs of switching to a teleconsultation-dominated system. | Source Title: | Digestive Diseases | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/243795 | ISSN: | 0257-2753 1421-9875 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000530165 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDI530165.pdf | 182.01 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License