Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/242478
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUSER EXPOSURE TO PRINTER EMISSIONS UNDER DIFFERENT VENTILATION SCENARIOS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH
dc.contributor.authorVIVIAN NGO HUI MIN
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T02:06:07Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T02:06:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationVIVIAN NGO HUI MIN (2023). USER EXPOSURE TO PRINTER EMISSIONS UNDER DIFFERENT VENTILATION SCENARIOS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/242478
dc.description.abstractLaser printing, with its emissions poses health risks to users. Although the types of pollutants that printers produce are well-researched, less is known about the impact of the types of ventilation on exposure to those pollutants. Given that humans spend up to 90% of their time indoors where laser printers are, it highlights the need to choose the most appropriate ventilation system that will keep printer emissions at a safe level. This study focuses on the National University of Singapore (NUS) School of Design and Environment 1 (SDE1) printing room to determine user exposure to printer emissions under different ventilation scenarios in the real environment. The scenarios include having the room without ventilation, with the ACMV system in normal operation, with cross-ventilation, single-sided ventilation and cross-ventilation with pedestal fan assisted. Real-time measurements of common printer pollutants and the overall indoor air quality of the room were carried out during printing for the evaluation of printer emissions and the ventilation systems. Specifically, 30 black and white pages with 5% toner coverage were printed during each round of air sampling. In this study, air pollutants were maintained at safe levels under all scenarios and it was concluded that exposure to printer pollutants is insignificant with light printing activity. This research found that different contaminants were best regulated by different methods of ventilation hence, there is no conclusive result as to which particular scenario is the most optimal for reducing printer emissions. However, formaldehyde appeared to be the most prominent emission by the printer used in this experiment and it was best regulated by cross-ventilation with fan.
dc.subjectBuilding
dc.subjectProject and Facilities Management
dc.subjectCheong Kok Wai David
dc.subject2022/2023 PFM
dc.subjectIndoor air quality
dc.subjectPrinter emissions
dc.subjectVentilation
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentTHE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
dc.contributor.supervisorCHEONG KOK WAI, DAVID
dc.description.degreeBACHELOR'S
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (PROJECT AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT)
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Vivian Ngo Hui Min DBE_Hui Min, Vivian Ngo.pdf3.02 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.