Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129008
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGeotechnical characteristics of lateritic clay admixed with biomass silica stabiliser
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sin-Mei
dc.contributor.authorYao, Kai
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Yanbin
dc.contributor.authorLim, Zi-Chao
dc.contributor.authorBakar, Ismail Hj
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T11:37:58Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T11:37:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-20
dc.identifier.citationLim, Sin-Mei, Yao, Kai, Jiang, Yanbin, Lim, Zi-Chao, Bakar, Ismail Hj (2021-09-20). Geotechnical characteristics of lateritic clay admixed with biomass silica stabiliser. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 321. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129008
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.issn1879-1786
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/242047
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the effectiveness of using varying proportion (2%, 4% and 6% by dry weight of soil) of a newly formulated biomass silica soil stabiliser (BSS) on tropical lateritic clay which has deleterious effects on construction materials due to its high amounts of SiO2 and Fe2O3. A series of laboratory experiment testing methods: i.e. particle size distribution, Atterberg Limits, linear shrinkage, pH value, compaction, California Bearing Ratio, unconfined compression test, and cyclic load triaxial test were conducted in accordance to BS1377:1990 and AASHTO T307–99:2003 to examine the geotechnical properties of the BSS structured lateritic clay subjected to 0, 7, 14 and 28 curing days. Physicochemical tests such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) were conducted to further support the mineralogical composition and microstructure evidence of the structured soil and substantiate the interpretation of the mechanical strength data. The test results reveal that the notable changes in the properties and behavior of structured lateritic clay was governed by the BSS proportion and curing period. There is an immediate enhancement in the geotechnical properties of the 2% BSS structured lateritic clay, altering soil type from CH to MH before curing begin. The unconfined compressive test results indicate a distinct effectiveness in stabilizing lateritic clay, from 400 kPa to 3675 kPa for 6% BSS structured lateritic clay cured to 28 days. Both soaked and unsoaked California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values were 12.4 and 5.8 folds higher than that of the virgin lateritic clay. The cyclic load triaxial test reveals that the resilient modulus, MR of the structured soil was significantly increased. For full-scale applications, the association between the mechanical properties and linear shrinkage test results deduce that the optimum proportion of BSS required for an effective stabilisation performance is 6%. Finally, the mechanisms of the microstructural changes in the stabilisation process were mainly attributed to the agglomeration and aggregation of the cemented particle through composition of calcium silicate hydrate cementitious products evidenced in the physicochemical tests.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectGreen & Sustainable Science & Technology
dc.subjectEngineering, Environmental
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subjectScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subjectLateritic clay
dc.subjectBiomass silica
dc.subjectCompaction
dc.subjectCalifornia bearing ratio
dc.subjectUnconfined compressive strength
dc.subjectResilient modulus
dc.subjectCuring period
dc.subjectRICE HUSK ASH
dc.subjectSOIL STABILIZATION
dc.subjectENGINEERING PROPERTIES
dc.subjectSHEAR-STRENGTH
dc.subjectRESIDUAL SOIL
dc.subjectCEMENT
dc.subjectCONCRETE
dc.subjectGEOPOLYMER
dc.subjectAGGREGATE
dc.subjectCALCIUM
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-06-07T03:20:01Z
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129008
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
dc.description.volume321
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Lim et al (2021) JCLP.pdfPublished version14.63 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.