Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review
dc.contributor.authorKaphingst, Kimberly A
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Emily
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jingsong
dc.contributor.authorGaysynsky, Anna
dc.contributor.authorElrick, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorHong, Soo Jung
dc.contributor.authorKrakow, Melinda
dc.contributor.authorPokharel, Manusheela
dc.contributor.authorRatcliff, Chelsea L
dc.contributor.authorKlein, William MP
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, Muin J
dc.contributor.authorChou, Wen-Ying Sylvia
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-08T05:36:20Z
dc.date.available2023-06-08T05:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citationKaphingst, Kimberly A, Peterson, Emily, Zhao, Jingsong, Gaysynsky, Anna, Elrick, Ashley, Hong, Soo Jung, Krakow, Melinda, Pokharel, Manusheela, Ratcliff, Chelsea L, Klein, William MP, Khoury, Muin J, Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia (2019-08-01). Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review. GENETICS IN MEDICINE 21 (8) : 1691-1698. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0
dc.identifier.issn1098-3600
dc.identifier.issn1530-0366
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241719
dc.description.abstractEffective use of genetic and genomic data in cancer prevention and treatment depends on adequate communication with patients and the public. Although relevant empirical work has emerged, the scope and outcomes of this communication research have not been characterized. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of recent published research (2010–2017) on communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic testing (CGT) information. Searches in six databases revealed 9243 unique records; 513 papers were included. Most papers utilized an observational quantitative design; fewer utilized an experimental design. More attention has been paid to outcomes of CGT results disclosure than to decision making regarding CGT uptake or the process of results disclosure. Psychosocial outcomes were most common across studies. This literature has a strong focus on BRCA1/2, with few papers focused on Lynch syndrome or next-generation technologies. Women, Caucasians, older adults, and those of higher socioeconomic status were overrepresented. Research gaps identified include the need for studies on the process of CGT communication; examining behavioral, decision making, and communication outcomes; and inclusion of diverse populations. Addressing these gaps can help improve the use of genomics in cancer control and reduce disparities in access to and use of CGT.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectGenetics & Heredity
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectgenetic testing
dc.subjectreturn of results
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectBREAST-CANCER
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectINFORMATION
dc.typeReview
dc.date.updated2023-06-06T04:28:18Z
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNICATIONS AND NEW MEDIA
dc.description.doi10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0
dc.description.sourcetitleGENETICS IN MEDICINE
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue8
dc.description.page1691-1698
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine a scoping review.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.