A RESTATEMENT OF CHARACTER EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241468

DC Field	Value
dc.title	A RESTATEMENT OF CHARACTER EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS
dc.contributor.author	WEN WEIYANG
dc.date.accessioned	2023-05-31T18:00:41Z
dc.date.available	2023-05-31T18:00:41Z
dc.date.issued	2022-12-05
dc.identifier.citation	WEN WEIYANG (2022-12-05). A RESTATEMENT OF CHARACTER EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.uri	https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241468
dc.description.abstract	The advent of bench trials in common law jurisdictions is an epochal event as it presents existential challenges to the law of evidence. In this connection, the similar facts rule is an interesting case study as it allows scholars to understand the extent to which the similar facts rule is relevant to the bench trial context. As I will show, there are epistemic and moral reasons to retain the similar facts rule in the bench trial.
dc.language.iso	en
dc.subject	Similar facts Rule, bench trials, the law of evidence, character evidence, criminal records, law and psychology
dc.type	Thesis
dc.contributor.department	DEAN'S OFFICE (LAW)
dc.contributor.supervisor	Hock Lai Ho
dc.description.degree	Ph.D
dc.description.degreeconferred	DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (FOL)
dc.identifier.orcid	0009-0007-8998-274X
Appears in Collections:	Ph.D Theses (Open)

File	Description	Size	Format	Access Settings	Version
WenWY.pdf		3.35 MB	Adobe PDF	OPEN	None	View/Download

Check