Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236091
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMyanmar Identity in 2015
dc.contributor.authorCho Zin Thet
dc.contributor.authorMaitrii Aung-Thwin
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T06:50:38Z
dc.date.available2023-01-11T06:50:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationCho Zin Thet, Maitrii Aung-Thwin (2019). Myanmar Identity in 2015 : 1-22. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236091
dc.description.abstractIn November 2015, Myanmar conducted its second general elections under the 2008 Constitution. The elections followed four years of celebrated political and economic reforms under President Thein Sein’s administration, surprising many observers who had not taken the former military government’s 2003 “Roadmap to Democracy” very seriously. This blueprint focused on a seven-step plan that called for a gradual, deliberate, and managed political transition that was not centered around Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD), the main opposition party who many regarded as the only legitimate agent for political change. Nonetheless, by 2015 President Thein Sein was hailed for laying down the foundations for democratic change, an opening of the country’s economy, and for introducing a range of legislation that loosened the state’s control on the everyday lives of Myanmar’s citizens. The NLD’s overwhelming election victory and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s ascension to power seemed to signal for her supporters the closing of a chapter in Myanmar’s contemporary history that began when citizens took to the streets in 1988. The elections were commended by international observers as being free and fair, both due to its inclusiveness (over ninety political parties participated), its operational credibility, and perhaps due to its desired result. At the same time, widespread poverty, disagreements with armed ethnic minorities, communal violence in Western Myanmar, internal factionalism amongst political elites, and a lingering constitutional crisis were issues that characterized the political landscape in 2015. While enduring themes of “unity” and “sovereignty” continued to be relevant as expressions of national identity, the increasing use of terms associated with democracy and the broader liberalization process were also sources for articulating belonging and affiliation to the nation.
dc.publisherNational University of Singapore
dc.sourceSSRTG
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectPeace
dc.subjectArmed conflicts
dc.subjectReforms
dc.subjectElection
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectEthnic Armed Organizations/Groups
dc.subjectChinese/China
dc.subjectParliament
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectAccountable/responsible
dc.subjectPolitical Dialogue
dc.subjectTransitions
dc.subjectCivil Society
dc.subjectNational Reconciliation
dc.subjectSustainable/sustainability
dc.subjectInvestment
dc.subjectGood Governance
dc.subjectTransparent/transparency
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentASIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
dc.description.page1-22
dc.published.stateUnpublished
dc.grant.idMOE2016-SSRTG-020
dc.grant.fundingagencySocial Science Research Council
Appears in Collections:Department Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Myanmar Identity Report 2015.pdf261.3 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.