Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236064
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Singapore National Identities 2015 | |
dc.contributor.author | Clara Lee | |
dc.contributor.author | Teo Kay Key | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-11T05:20:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-11T05:20:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clara Lee, Teo Kay Key (2019). Singapore National Identities 2015 : 1-20. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236064 | |
dc.description.abstract | The dominant national identity discourse for Singapore in 2015 is “Progress”, which depicts the transformation of Singapore from third to first world. From the perspective of the masses, this positive change can be attributed to the capability and commitment of the elites. The three other national identity discourses that were uncovered, namely “Inclusive”, “Turbulent Past”, and “Non-complacency”, complement this dominant narrative of “Progress”. Singapore has not only developed into an economically prosperous country, but also a fair and inclusive society where fellow citizens treat each other with dignity and respect regardless of economic status, ethnicity, or culture. The unfavourable conditions faced by Singapore in its early days also serve as an appropriate backdrop against which the present achievements of the country can be contrasted. The non-complacency of the elites and masses in improving the status quo, stemming from the populace’s ingrained vulnerabilities as citizens of a small state, was an integral driving force of the growth that Singapore witnessed, and remains to be so as the country seeks to stay relevant. Finally, an alternative discourse, under which the masses reveal the inequalities which persists today and the lack of full inclusivity in Singapore, was also observed, offering a stark contrast to the other discourses which are mainly positive in nature. | |
dc.publisher | National University of Singapore | |
dc.source | SSRTG | |
dc.subject | Equality | |
dc.subject | Race | |
dc.subject | Lee Kuan Yew | |
dc.subject | Openness | |
dc.subject | Unity | |
dc.subject | Survival | |
dc.subject | Education | |
dc.subject | Independence | |
dc.subject | Self-reliance | |
dc.subject | Colonialism | |
dc.subject | Culture | |
dc.subject | Resilience | |
dc.subject | War Experience | |
dc.subject | Third to First World | |
dc.subject | Defence | |
dc.subject | Meritocracy | |
dc.subject | Patriotism | |
dc.subject | Effective Leadership | |
dc.subject | Founding Father | |
dc.subject | Diplomacy | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | ASIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE | |
dc.description.page | 1-20 | |
dc.published.state | Unpublished | |
dc.grant.id | MOE2016-SSRTG-020 | |
dc.grant.fundingagency | Social Science Research Council | |
Appears in Collections: | Department Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore English Identity Report 2015.pdf | 332.27 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.