Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.589183
Title: | Interdisciplinary Assessment of Hygiene Practices in Multiple Locations: Implications for COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness in Vietnam | Authors: | Nguyen, Trang Huyen Thi Le, Huong Thi Le, Xuan Thi Thanh Do, Toan Thanh Thi Ngo, Toan Van Phan, Hai Thanh Vu, Giang Thu Nguyen, Tu Huu Phung, Dung Tri Nghiem, Son Hong Vu, Thuc Minh Thi Nguyen, Thu Ha Tran, Trung Dinh Do, Khanh Nam Truong, Dat Van Le, Thanh Tuan Tran, Bach Xuan Latkin, Carl A. Ho, Roger C. M. Ho, Cyrus S. H. |
Keywords: | coronavirus hygiene practice local preparedness pandemic prevention sanitation practice |
Issue Date: | 26-Jan-2021 | Publisher: | Frontiers Media S.A. | Citation: | Nguyen, Trang Huyen Thi, Le, Huong Thi, Le, Xuan Thi Thanh, Do, Toan Thanh Thi, Ngo, Toan Van, Phan, Hai Thanh, Vu, Giang Thu, Nguyen, Tu Huu, Phung, Dung Tri, Nghiem, Son Hong, Vu, Thuc Minh Thi, Nguyen, Thu Ha, Tran, Trung Dinh, Do, Khanh Nam, Truong, Dat Van, Le, Thanh Tuan, Tran, Bach Xuan, Latkin, Carl A., Ho, Roger C. M., Ho, Cyrus S. H. (2021-01-26). Interdisciplinary Assessment of Hygiene Practices in Multiple Locations: Implications for COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness in Vietnam. Frontiers in Public Health 8 : 589183. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.589183 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Due to the shared border with China, Vietnam faced risks from the COVID-19 pandemic at the early stages of the outbreak. Good hygiene practices were considered an effective prevention method, but there were only minimal data on the effectiveness of hygiene practices against the pandemic at the community level. Thus, this study aims to assess hygiene practices in society by using a community-based survey. A cross-sectional study using survey monkey was conducted from December 2019 to February 2020. The Snowball sampling technique was used to recruit participants and exploratory factor analysis was applied to scrutinize the construct validity of the measurement. We used the Tobit regression model to assess the association. Hygiene in a high-risk environment and hygiene in the social and educational environment were two main factors after applying the EFA method. Participants grade community sanitation quite low (around 6 out of 10). Furthermore, the mean score of hygiene practice at a local level in a high-risk environment was slightly low at 6.0. The score of sanitation in the Central region (5.3) was quite low compared to the North (5.8) and the South (6.2). The most high-risk environment was construction, industrial zone and food safety. Moreover, younger respondents were more likely to report poorer hygiene practices in high-risk environments (Coefficient = ?1.67; 95% CI = ?3.03; ?0.32) and social and educational environment (Coefficient = ?1.29; 95% CI = ?2.54; ?0.04). Our study gives an insight into pandemic preparedness at the grassroots level. The findings suggest the necessity of specific communication education for society to improve the compliance of hygiene practices to prevent the spreading of COVID-19. © Copyright © 2021 Nguyen, Le, Le, Do, Ngo, Phan, Vu, Nguyen, Phung, Nghiem, Vu, Nguyen, Tran, Do, Truong, Le, Tran, Latkin, Ho and Ho. | Source Title: | Frontiers in Public Health | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233280 | ISSN: | 2296-2565 | DOI: | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.589183 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_3389_fpubh_2020_589183.pdf | 179.32 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on Mar 18, 2023
Page view(s)
24
checked on Mar 16, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License