Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02507-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleFeasibility & Efficacy of Deprescribing rounds in a Singapore rehabilitative hospital- a randomised controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorWong, Andrew Peng Yong
dc.contributor.authorTing, Tan Wan
dc.contributor.authorCharissa, Ee Jia Ming
dc.contributor.authorBoon, Tan Wee
dc.contributor.authorHeng, Kwan Yu
dc.contributor.authorLeng, Low Lian
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T06:42:55Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T06:42:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-21
dc.identifier.citationWong, Andrew Peng Yong, Ting, Tan Wan, Charissa, Ee Jia Ming, Boon, Tan Wee, Heng, Kwan Yu, Leng, Low Lian (2021-10-21). Feasibility & Efficacy of Deprescribing rounds in a Singapore rehabilitative hospital- a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics 21 (1) : 584. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02507-0
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233023
dc.description.abstractBackground: Deprescribing is effective and safe in reducing polypharmacy among the elderly. However, the impact of deprescribing rounds remain unclear in Asian settings. Hence, we conducted this study. Methods: An open label randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients of 65 years and above, under rehabilitation or subacute care and with prespecified medications from a Singapore rehabilitation hospital. They were randomised using a computer generated sequence. The intervention consisted of weekly multidisciplinary team-led deprescribing rounds (using five steps of deprescribing) and usual care. The control had only usual care. The primary outcome is the percentage change in total daily dose (TDD) from baseline upon discharge, while the secondary outcomes are the total number of medicine, total daily cost and TDD up to day 28 postdischarge, overall side-effect rates, rounding time and the challenges. Efficacy outcomes were analysed using intention-to-treat while other outcomes were analysed as per protocol. Results: 260 patients were randomised and 253 were analysed after excluding dropouts (female: 57.3%; median age: 76 years). Baseline characteristics were largely similar in both groups. The intervention arm (n = 126) experienced a greater reduction of TDD on discharge [Median (IQR): ? 19.62% (? 34.38, 0.00%) versus 0.00% (? 12.00, 6.82%); p < 0.001], more constipation (OR: 3.75, 95% CI:1.75–8.06, p < 0.001) and laxative re-prescriptions (OR: 2.82, 95% CI:1.30–6.12, p = 0.009) though death and hospitalisation rates were similar. The median rounding time was 7.09 min per patient and challenges include the inconvenience in assembling the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion: Deprescribing rounds can safely reduce TDD of medicine upon discharge compared to usual care in a Singaporean rehabilitation hospital. Trial registration: This study is first registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (protocol number: NCT03713112) on 19/10/2018 and the protocol can be accessed on https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectDeprescribing
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary team
dc.subjectOpen label
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trial
dc.subjectRounds
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEPT OF PHARMACY
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12877-021-02507-0
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Geriatrics
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page584
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12877-021-02507-0.pdf758.26 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Jan 30, 2023

Page view(s)

21
checked on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons