Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13211
Title: Predictor complexity and feature selection affect Maxent model transferability: Evidence from global freshwater invasive species
Authors: Low, Bi Wei 
Zeng, Yiwen 
Tan, Heok Hui 
Yeo, Darren C. J. 
Keywords: aquatic invasions
bioclimatic variables
ecological niche model
feature selection
Maxent
model tuning
niche conservatism
predictor selection
species distribution model
transferability
Issue Date: 16-Dec-2020
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Citation: Low, Bi Wei, Zeng, Yiwen, Tan, Heok Hui, Yeo, Darren C. J. (2020-12-16). Predictor complexity and feature selection affect Maxent model transferability: Evidence from global freshwater invasive species. Diversity and Distributions 27 (3) : 497-511. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13211
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Aim: Ecological niche models (ENMs) are widely used to address urgent real-world problems such as climate change effects or invasive species; however, the generality of models when projected through space and/or time, that is transferability, remains a key challenge. Here, we explored the effects of complex predictors and feature selection on ENM transferability in a widely employed algorithm, Maxent, using five globally invasive freshwater species as case studies. Location: Global. Methods: We modelled the global distributions of five notorious freshwater invasive species (African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus, Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus, American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus, red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii, and Australian redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus), using three predictor datasets of varying complexities derived from two commonly used climatic data sources (WorldClim and IPCC) and three methods of model tuning that differentially incorporated feature selection. Spatially explicit transferability assessments were then conducted using a suite of evaluation metrics previously used to quantify Maxent model performance. Results: We show that in the absence of detailed biological knowledge of focal species, simpler predictor datasets produce models that are more accurate than those calibrated using comprehensive “bioclimatic” datasets. Additionally, we find that tuning models for both optimal regularization parameters as well as feature-class combinations led to the greatest increases in transferability and geographic niche conservatism. Results indicate a tenuous link between model transferability and Akaike's information criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc), suggesting that the indiscriminate use of AICc as an estimate of model parsimony may lead to erratic model performance. Main conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that methodological considerations can drastically affect the reliability of spatial and possibly temporal projections, which has severe implications when ENMs are used to infer species’ niches, and quantify ecological or evolutionary change across impacted landscapes. © 2020 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Source Title: Diversity and Distributions
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232835
ISSN: 1366-9516
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13211
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1111_ddi_13211.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons