Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12821
Title: Environmental liability litigation could remedy biodiversity loss
Authors: Phelps, Jacob
Aravind, Sakshi
Cheyne, Susan
Dabrowski Pedrini, Isabella
Fajrini, Rika
Jones, Carol A.
Lees, Alexander C.
Mance, Anna
Nagara, Grahat
Nugraha, Taufiq P.
Pendergrass, John
Purnamasari, Umi
Rodriguez, Maribel
Saputra, Roni
Sharp, Stuart P.
Sokolowki, Amir
Webb, Edward L. 
Keywords: civil law
compensation
conservation litigation
environmental governance
justice
lawsuit
natural resources
Issue Date: 9-Jun-2021
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
Citation: Phelps, Jacob, Aravind, Sakshi, Cheyne, Susan, Dabrowski Pedrini, Isabella, Fajrini, Rika, Jones, Carol A., Lees, Alexander C., Mance, Anna, Nagara, Grahat, Nugraha, Taufiq P., Pendergrass, John, Purnamasari, Umi, Rodriguez, Maribel, Saputra, Roni, Sharp, Stuart P., Sokolowki, Amir, Webb, Edward L. (2021-06-09). Environmental liability litigation could remedy biodiversity loss. Conservation Letters 14 (6) : e12821. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12821
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Many countries allow lawsuits to hold responsible parties liable for the environmental harm they cause. Such litigation remains largely untested in most biodiversity hotspots and is rarely used in response to leading drivers of biodiversity loss, including illegal wildlife trade. Yet, liability litigation is a potentially ground-breaking conservation strategy to remedy harm to biodiversity by seeking legal remedies such as species rehabilitation, public apologies, habitat conservation and education, with the goal of making the injured parties ‘whole’. However, precedent cases, expert guidance, and experience to build such conservation lawsuits is nascent in most countries. We propose a simplified framework for developing conservation lawsuits across countries and conservation contexts. We explain liability litigation in terms of three dimensions: (1) defining the harm that occurred, (2) identifying appropriate remedies to that harm, and (3) understanding what remedies the law and courts will allow. We illustrate the framework via a hypothetical lawsuit against an illegal orangutan trader in Indonesia. We highlight that conservationists’ expertise is essential to characterizing harm and identifying remedies, and could more actively contribute to strategic, science-based litigation. This would identify priority contexts, target defendants responsible for egregious harm, propose novel and meaningful remedies, and build new transdisciplinary collaborations. © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Source Title: Conservation Letters
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232381
ISSN: 1755-263X
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12821
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1111_conl_12821.pdf255.34 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 29, 2022

Page view(s)

14
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons