Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020588
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRadiant floors versus radiant walls using ceramic thermal panels in mediterranean dwellings: Annual energy demand and cost-effective analysis
dc.contributor.authorEcharri-Iribarren, Victor
dc.contributor.authorHien, W.N.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Ostiz, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T08:06:08Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T08:06:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-09
dc.identifier.citationEcharri-Iribarren, Victor, Hien, W.N., Sánchez-Ostiz, A. (2021-01-09). Radiant floors versus radiant walls using ceramic thermal panels in mediterranean dwellings: Annual energy demand and cost-effective analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13 (2) : Jan-26. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020588
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232182
dc.description.abstractThe present study focuses on the application of large-format thermal ceramic conditioning panels (TCPs) containing polypropylene (PPR) capillary tube mats in dwellings on the Mediterranean coast. The thermal and energy behaviours were examined once the underfloor heating was installed, and they were compared with an alternative wall application. The system was implemented in a single-family house located on the Spanish Mediterranean coast. After having monitored the house during a complete one-year cycle, the annual energy demand was quantified using the Design Builder tool. TCP panels applied to radiant floors reduced energy demand by 5.15% compared to the wall-layout alternative. Significant reductions in CO2 emissions were also achieved, as well as a 25.19% reduction in energy demand compared to convection systems. The incorporation of 24 m2 of solar thermal panels into the system, combined with solar cooling systems based on lithium chloride, was also analysed. A reduction in energy demand of 57.46% was obtained compared to all-air convection systems. Finally, the amortisation periods of the investments in TCP panels and solar panels were calculated and compared to a convection system. Underfloor TCP panels proved to be more cost-effective than a wall installation. The additional cost of EUR 21,844 could be amortised over approximately 14 years with the radiant underfloor TCP system, while the wall TCP would be amortised over 17.4 years. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectCapillary tube mats
dc.subjectEnergy saving
dc.subjectIntegration energy and architecture
dc.subjectInvestment amortisation
dc.subjectRenewable energy
dc.subjectSolar thermal panels
dc.subjectThermal ceramic panel
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF DESIGN & ENV)
dc.description.doi10.3390/su13020588
dc.description.sourcetitleSustainability (Switzerland)
dc.description.volume13
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pageJan-26
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_su13020588.pdf4.85 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Jan 30, 2023

Page view(s)

16
checked on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons