Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021465
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTreating acutely ill patients at home: Data from Singapore.
dc.contributor.authorKo, Stephanie Q
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Joel
dc.contributor.authorTay, Yee Kian
dc.contributor.authorNashi, Norshima
dc.contributor.authorHooi, Benjamin MY
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Nan
dc.contributor.authorKuan, Win Sen
dc.contributor.authorSoong, John TY
dc.contributor.authorChan, Derek
dc.contributor.authorLai, Yi Feng
dc.contributor.authorLim, Yee Wei
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T12:15:21Z
dc.date.available2022-08-15T12:15:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.identifier.citationKo, Stephanie Q, Goh, Joel, Tay, Yee Kian, Nashi, Norshima, Hooi, Benjamin MY, Luo, Nan, Kuan, Win Sen, Soong, John TY, Chan, Derek, Lai, Yi Feng, Lim, Yee Wei (2022-07). Treating acutely ill patients at home: Data from Singapore.. Ann Acad Med Singap 51 (7) : 392-399. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021465
dc.identifier.issn0304-4602
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/230299
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Hospital-at-home programmes are well described in the literature but not in Asia. We describe a home-based inpatient substitutive care programme in Singapore, with clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a hospital-at-home programme from September 2020 to September 2021. Suitable patients, who otherwise required hospitalisation, were admitted to the programme. They were from inpatient wards, emergency department and community nursing teams in the western part of Singapore, where a multidisciplinary team provided hospital-level care at home. Electronic health record data were extracted from all patients admitted to the programme. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted post-discharge. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 (standard deviation 16.7) years, and 46% were male. The main diagnoses were skin and soft tissue infections (35%), urinary tract infections (29%) and fluid overload (18%). Median length of stay was 4 (interquartile range 3-7) days. Seven patients were escalated back to the hospital, of whom 2 died after escalation. One patient died at home. There was 1 case of adverse drug reaction and 1 fall at home, and no cases of hospital-acquired infections. Patient satisfaction rates were high and 94% of contactable patients would choose to participate again. CONCLUSION: Hospital-at-home programmes appear to be safe and feasible alternatives to inpatient care in Singapore. Further studies are warranted to compare clinical outcomes and cost to conventional inpatient care.
dc.publisherAcademy of Medicine, Singapore
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectHome-based
dc.subjecthospital-at-home
dc.subjecthospital care
dc.subjectinternal medicine
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-08-12T09:46:05Z
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentPHARMACY
dc.description.doi10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021465
dc.description.sourcetitleAnn Acad Med Singap
dc.description.volume51
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.page392-399
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.