Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.390
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCarfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR
dc.contributor.authorChng, W-J
dc.contributor.authorGoldschmidt, H
dc.contributor.authorDimopoulos, MA
dc.contributor.authorMoreau, P
dc.contributor.authorJoshua, D
dc.contributor.authorPalumbo, A
dc.contributor.authorFacon, T
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, H
dc.contributor.authorPour, L
dc.contributor.authorNiesvizky, R
dc.contributor.authorOriol, A
dc.contributor.authorRosinol, L
dc.contributor.authorSuvorov, A
dc.contributor.authorGaidano, G
dc.contributor.authorPika, T
dc.contributor.authorWeisel, K
dc.contributor.authorGoranova-Marinova, V
dc.contributor.authorGillenwater, HH
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, N
dc.contributor.authorFeng, S
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, S
dc.contributor.authorHajek, R
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T07:17:04Z
dc.date.available2022-07-21T07:17:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.identifier.citationChng, W-J, Goldschmidt, H, Dimopoulos, MA, Moreau, P, Joshua, D, Palumbo, A, Facon, T, Ludwig, H, Pour, L, Niesvizky, R, Oriol, A, Rosinol, L, Suvorov, A, Gaidano, G, Pika, T, Weisel, K, Goranova-Marinova, V, Gillenwater, HH, Mohamed, N, Feng, S, Aggarwal, S, Hajek, R (2017-06-01). Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR. LEUKEMIA 31 (6) : 1368-1374. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.390
dc.identifier.issn08876924
dc.identifier.issn14765551
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/229014
dc.description.abstractThe randomized phase 3 study ENDEAVOR demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a preplanned subgroup analysis of ENDEAVOR to evaluate Kd vs Vd by cytogenetic risk. Of 785 patients with known cytogenetics, 210 (27%) had high-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=97 (25%); Vd, n=113 (28%)) and 575 (73%) had standard-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=284 (75%); Vd, n=291 (72%)). Median PFS in the high-risk group was 8.8 months for Kd vs 6.0 months for Vd (hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.92; P=0.0075). Median PFS in the standard-risk group was not estimable for Kd vs 10.2 months for Vd (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P<0.0001). Overall response rates were 72.2% (Kd) vs 58.4% (Vd) in the high-risk group and 79.2% (Kd) vs 66.0% (Vd) in the standard-risk group. In the high-risk group, 15.5% (Kd) vs 4.4% (Vd) achieved a complete response (CR) or better. In the standard-risk group, 13.0% (Kd) vs 7.9% (Vd) achieved â 3/4CR. This preplanned subgroup analysis found that Kd was superior to Vd in relapsed or refractory MM, regardless of cytogenetic risk.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectHematology
dc.subjectLOW-DOSE DEXAMETHASONE
dc.subjectSTEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION
dc.subjectPLUS DEXAMETHASONE
dc.subjectINTERGROUPE FRANCOPHONE
dc.subjectDELETION 17P
dc.subjectLENALIDOMIDE
dc.subjectTHERAPY
dc.subjectABNORMALITIES
dc.subjectPOMALIDOMIDE
dc.subjectTHALIDOMIDE
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-07-17T12:13:36Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.1038/leu.2016.390
dc.description.sourcetitleLEUKEMIA
dc.description.volume31
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page1368-1374
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the .pdfPublished version200.54 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.