Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-04979-7
DC FieldValue
dc.titleShort-term strength and balance training does not improve quality of life but improves functional status in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorVenkataraman, Kavita
dc.contributor.authorTai, Bee Choo
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, Eric YH
dc.contributor.authorTavintharan, Subramaniam
dc.contributor.authorChandran, Kurumbian
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Siew Wai
dc.contributor.authorPhua, Melissa SLA
dc.contributor.authorWee, Hwee Lin
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Gerald CH
dc.contributor.authorTai, E Shyong
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T06:40:30Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T06:40:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.identifier.citationVenkataraman, Kavita, Tai, Bee Choo, Khoo, Eric YH, Tavintharan, Subramaniam, Chandran, Kurumbian, Hwang, Siew Wai, Phua, Melissa SLA, Wee, Hwee Lin, Koh, Gerald CH, Tai, E Shyong (2019-12-01). Short-term strength and balance training does not improve quality of life but improves functional status in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised controlled trial. DIABETOLOGIA 62 (12) : 2200-2210. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-04979-7
dc.identifier.issn0012-186X
dc.identifier.issn1432-0428
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228114
dc.description.abstractAims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of a structured strength and balance training intervention in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional status in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods: The study was a single-blind parallel-group randomised controlled trial comparing 2 months of once-weekly home-based strength and balance training against standard medical therapy. Participants were patients with physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes and neuropathy recruited from five public sector institutions in Singapore between July 2014 and October 2017. Participants were block-randomised to intervention or control arms. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2 months and 6 months by a trained assessor blinded to group assignment. Primary outcomes were change in physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36v2 (a 36-item generic HRQoL instrument that has been validated for use in Singapore) and EQ-5D-5L index score (derived from a five-item generic HRQoL instrument [EQ-5D-5L]) over 6 months. Secondary outcomes were change in functional status (timed up-and-go [TUG], five times sit-to-stand [FTSTS], functional reach, static balance, ankle muscle strength and knee range of motion) and balance confidence over 6 months. Mean differences in scores between groups were compared using mixed models. Results: Of the 143 participants randomised (intervention, n = 70; control, n = 73), 67 participants were included in each arm for the final intention-to-treat analysis. The two groups were similar, except in terms of sex. There were no significant differences between groups on the primary outcomes of PCS score (mean difference [MD] 1.56 [95% CI −1.75, 4.87]; p = 0.355) and EQ-5D-5L index score (MD 0.02 [95% CI −0.01, 0.06]; p = 0.175). There were significant improvements in TUG test performance (MD −1.14 [95% CI −2.18, −0.1] s; p = 0.032), FTSTS test performance (MD −1.31 [95% CI −2.12, −0.51] s; p = 0.001), ankle muscle strength (MD 4.18 [95% CI 0.4, 7.92] N; p = 0.031), knee range of motion (MD 6.82 [95% CI 2.87, 10.78]°; p = 0.001) and balance confidence score (MD 6.17 [95% CI 1.89, 10.44]; p = 0.005). No adverse events due to study participation or study intervention were reported. Conclusions/interpretation: Short-term structured strength and balance training did not influence HRQoL but produced sustained improvements in functional status and balance confidence at 6 months. More intensive interventions may be needed to influence HRQoL in these individuals. However, this intervention may be a useful treatment option for individuals with DPN to reduce the risk of falls and injuries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02115932 Funding: This work was supported by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectEndocrinology & Metabolism
dc.subjectBalance
dc.subjectDiabetes
dc.subjectDiabetic neuropathy
dc.subjectFunctional ability
dc.subjectMuscle strength
dc.subjectPhysical therapy
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectPERCEIVED MOBILITY
dc.subjectFOOT ULCERATION
dc.subjectRISK-FACTORS
dc.subjectEXERCISE
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectPEOPLE
dc.subjectASSOCIATION
dc.subjectPOPULATION
dc.subjectSEVERITY
dc.subjectGAIT
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-07-06T08:00:18Z
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1007/s00125-019-04979-7
dc.description.sourcetitleDIABETOLOGIA
dc.description.volume62
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page2200-2210
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Short-term strength and balance training does not improve quality of life but improves functional status in individuals with.pdf656.57 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.