Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/223206
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA CRITIQUE OF ECO-RESORTS IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA
dc.contributor.authorHIRAL ASHVIN DESAI
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-30T07:14:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T18:30:29Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:10Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T18:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-30
dc.identifier.citationHIRAL ASHVIN DESAI (2014-09-30). A CRITIQUE OF ECO-RESORTS IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/223206
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to act as a critique of the eco-resort concept, by questioning its definition and priorities, in the context of South-East Asia today. With an annual average growth rate of 6.8%, the tourism industry in this region is amongst the most rapidly developing in the world. This rapid expansion has then been accompanied by a surge of infrastructural development. While eco-resorts may seem like a viable solution to minimizing the impact of this growth, this building typology currently, lacks conceptual clarity and industry-wide consensus, leaving it open to interpretation, and as is often the case, misinterpretation. A field study of three eco-resorts in Thailand and Malaysia revealed that more focus is being placed on green systems and practices, than on architectural design. Systems refer to the application of technology and sustainable practices, with the intention of conserving resources like water and energy. While such systems are indeed important in reducing the physical, economic and socio-cultural footprint of a resort, on their own, they seem inadequate as a complete representation of the typology of an eco-resort. At present, their application is planned separately from the resort's architectural aspects, which include massing, material, facade and roof design, resulting in a lack of integration. This essay seeks to prove that greater efficiency in resource management and clarity in architectural language, could be achieved if these two aspects of architecture and systems were closely integrated. In this context, integration is attained when the resort's architectural strategies influence its application of systems and conversely, its systems influence its architectural design. The sustainable strategies in each resort was then studied within this framework.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/2757
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.subjectDesign Technology and Sustainability
dc.subjectDTS
dc.subjectMaster (Architecture)
dc.subject2012/2013 Aki DTS
dc.subjectArch
dc.subjectEco-resort
dc.subjectIntegration
dc.subjectSouth-east Asia
dc.subjectFlorian Benjamin Schaetz
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentARCHITECTURE
dc.contributor.supervisorFLORIAN BENJAMIN SCHAETZ
dc.description.degreeMaster's
dc.description.degreeconferredMASTER OF ARCHITECTURE (M.ARCH)
dc.embargo.terms2014-10-07
Appears in Collections:Master's Theses (Restricted)

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Hiral Ashvin Desai 2012-2013.pdf23.17 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Page view(s)

31
checked on Nov 17, 2022

Download(s)

3
checked on Nov 17, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.