Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222359
DC FieldValue
dc.titleBUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION
dc.contributor.authorSIO TECK CHEONG STEPHEN
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-11T03:06:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T18:04:51Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:05Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T18:04:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-11
dc.identifier.citationSIO TECK CHEONG STEPHEN (2017-07-11). BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222359
dc.description.abstractBusiness Continuity Management (BCM) refers to a set of defined responses aimed at mitigating the impact on and ensuring the continuity of a company s operation upon the occurrence of a crisis. This manner of mitigation is introduced into Singapore in the form of the Technical Reference for Business Continuity Management (TR 19: 2005) (Spring Singapore, 2005). In today s unpredictable environment, adequate preparation is required to effectively mitigate the impacts of adverse occurrences. This study evaluates the applicability of TR 19: 2005 in the local context and introduces a checklist for reference. This research comprises of a general survey to determine the influence of BCM in large construction companies (Grade A1 and A2) and determine their responses towards possible crises. It then focused on two large construction companies to determine the differences between having and not having BCM. The objectives are to determine how responsive large construction companies are towards BCM, the crises perceived to be critical to their operations and their handling of crises in accordance with their culture. The survey results are analysed using descriptive statistics and t- tests. This is followed by interviews with two companies: one with BCM and the other without. It is concluded that there is a lack of implementation among large construction companies and greater effort is required to increase implementation. The factors: lack of awareness and inadequate personnel contributed to the cause. Companies preferred monetary advantages to the unpredictability of planning for crises that may never occur. Similarly, the role of the government in mitigating crises contributed to the lack of implementation. This suggests a reliance on the government during the occurrence of a severe crisis and BCM would be more applicable to crises like loss of company s data or an outbreak of fire locally.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/3854
dc.subjectBuilding
dc.subjectLow Sui Pheng
dc.subject2007/2008 Bu
dc.subjectBusiness Continuity Management
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectCrises
dc.subjectTR19: 2005
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectBu
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.supervisorLOW SUI PHENG
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (BUILDING)
dc.embargo.terms2017-07-12
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Sio Teck Cheong Stephen 2007-2008.pdf937.25 kBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.