Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222324
DC FieldValue
dc.titleINCORPORATION OF SINGAPORE GREEN BUILDING PRODUCT CERTIFICATION INTO GREEN MARK SCHEME - TOWARDS GREENER BUILDINGS
dc.contributor.authorLOW WEN CHYI VIVIEN
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-11T08:26:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T18:03:59Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:05Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T18:03:59Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-11
dc.identifier.citationLOW WEN CHYI VIVIEN (2014-07-11). INCORPORATION OF SINGAPORE GREEN BUILDING PRODUCT CERTIFICATION INTO GREEN MARK SCHEME - TOWARDS GREENER BUILDINGS. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222324
dc.description.abstractIn view of the current situation in Singapore, it provides the avenue to review Building and Construction Authority (BCA) Green Mark Scheme (GMS) and also increasingly recognized Singapore Green Building Product Certification (SGBPC). Likewise, the weighting of the assessment criteria for SGBPC can affect its stand in GMS. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine perceptions held by the developers and suppliers towards the betterment in the weighting of the assessment criteria.The research method adopted for this study is based on literature reviews, survey questionnaire and interviews. The survey questionnaires designed for the developers and SGBP suppliers are generated from the literature review and in-depth review. The results obtained through online drafted surveys are analysed and illustrated using frequencies and percentages. In addition, the results collected were also supported by the interview findings. It is concluded that there is room for improvement in finding a balance in the assessment criteria for both SGBPC and GMS. However, given that there are different certification scheme available in Singapore, the means to standardise the certification should be addressed first before it can be effectively infused into GMS. Thus, based on the analysis of the responses with reference to the interview findings, further recommendations are provided for better incorporation of SGBPC into GMS through balancing of the weighting of the assessment criteria.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/2684
dc.subjectBuilding
dc.subjectPFM
dc.subjectProject and Facilities Management
dc.subjectLee Siew Eang
dc.subject2013/2014 PFM
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.supervisorLEE SIEW EANG
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (PROJECT AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT)
dc.embargo.terms2014-07-14
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Low Wen Chyi Vivien 2013-2014.pdf2.67 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.