Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222139
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePURE ECONOMIC LOSS RELATED DISPUTES : DIFFERENT APPROACHES IN COMMON LAW JURISDICTION IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
dc.contributor.authorNGUYEN THI THANH NGA
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-20T08:41:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T17:58:15Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:04Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T17:58:15Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-20
dc.identifier.citationNGUYEN THI THANH NGA (2011-05-20). PURE ECONOMIC LOSS RELATED DISPUTES : DIFFERENT APPROACHES IN COMMON LAW JURISDICTION IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/222139
dc.description.abstractThe construction industry is prone to disputes resulting from defective buildings. One of the most discussed legal topics nowadays is the issue of pure economic loss and whether or not affected parties should be entitled to recover their losses. This dissertation attempts to look into an empirical development of decisions regarding pure economic loss claims in Asia Pacific nations whose jurisdictions have long been influenced by the decisions of the English courts. The aim is to examine selected jurisdictions that have departed from the English approach and to find any established methods or formula to deal with such claims. A literature review and case studies have been conducted as my chosen research methodologies. The definition of pure economic loss and the approaches that have been taken by English courts are first discussed. The comparison with positions in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Australia and Singapore is then made through investigating recent decisions of the courts. The author also goes into studying current regulation that gives solid policy considerations in this area of law. This dissertation shows that the situation of pure economic loss is still unsettled in most of the studied jurisdictions. Hong Kong and Malaysia have not followed the English Courts and used their own regulations and considerations to decide the issue. However, they have not reached consensus as to whether pure economic loss is recoverable. Meanwhile, Australian and Singaporean courts have shown constant liberal departure from the House of Lords’ decisions by conceiving their own tests in conjunction with exercising policy considerations when handling pure economic loss claims. This dissertation has achieved its core objectives of exploring the current development in the recovery of pure economic loss, especially those related to the construction industry.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/1592
dc.subjectBuilding
dc.subjectProject and Facilities Management
dc.subjectAsanga Gunawansa
dc.subject2010/2011 PFM
dc.subjectPure economic loss
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.supervisorASANGA GUNAWANSA
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (PROJECT AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT)
dc.embargo.terms2011-06-01
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Nguyen Thi Thanh Nga 2010-2011.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.