Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/221540
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGENERAL PERCEPTIONS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SMART PUBLIC HOMES FROM HOMEOWNERS' PERSPECTIVES
dc.contributor.authorNG YAN LIN
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-07T09:05:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T17:41:22Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T14:14:01Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T17:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-07
dc.identifier.citationNG YAN LIN (2016-01-07). GENERAL PERCEPTIONS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SMART PUBLIC HOMES FROM HOMEOWNERS' PERSPECTIVES. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/221540
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of smart public homes to support a sustainable and aging city in Singapore, it has been gaining popularity with more new and retrofitting projects available in the market. With its limited scale of application locally, existing homeowners have yet to appreciate the constitutions and benefits. To garner on the perceptions and willingness to pay, 422 existing homeowners were surveyed. Recent studies have shown the association of perceptions and demographical factors with acceptability level. To exploit the true perceived value using willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA), a contingent valuation method was used. It was suggested that close to 79% of the respondents were uncertain about smart homes, with a higher acceptability level for the young, higher income and education group. Though it was evident that the perceived benefits such as financial aspects have an impact on acceptance, it revealed a lack of market knowledge on smart homes from the empirical study on the factors hindering acceptability and cost-benefit analysis. Despite lower pricing and creation of awareness could motivate higher rate of implementation and better knowledge, a WTP value of 1.46% and WTA value of 3.18% reflect that existing homeowners are unable to assign an accurate value to smart homes without adequate knowledge of the benefits and features. This study managed to highlight various insights of the disparity and it was found that the true perceived value was 2.32%.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourcehttps://lib.sde.nus.edu.sg/dspace/handle/sde/3309
dc.subjectReal Estate
dc.subjectRE
dc.subjectYu Shi Ming
dc.subject2015/2016 RE
dc.subjectAcceptability
dc.subjectAwareness
dc.subjectPerceptions
dc.subjectSmart homes
dc.subjectWTA
dc.subjectWTP
dc.typeDissertation
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.contributor.supervisorYU SHI MING
dc.description.degreeBachelor's
dc.description.degreeconferredBACHELOR OF SCIENCE (REAL ESTATE)
dc.embargo.terms2016-01-11
Appears in Collections:Bachelor's Theses

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Ng Yan Lin 2015-2016.pdf1.31 MBAdobe PDF

RESTRICTED

NoneLog In

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.